We stop about Koldo for a documentary and various source I have found about pedophilia in the Catholic church. It all started with this:
http://es.youtube.com/watch?v=RSn0sNlEC9Y&feature=PlayList&p=32BC2D1843603B39&index=0
A series of 4 episodes of a BBC documentary hidden cases of pedophilia in the Catholic Church.
I, of course, I trusted no documentary (it seemed strange that the intelligent Cardinal Ratzinger, in the worst sense, of course, does not cover their tracks as it should). I looked on wikipedia and tachán:
http://es.wikipedia.oCatholic has been instructed by the Vatican at least since 1962 to keep certain cases of clerical sexual abuse related to secretly, under penalty of excommunication, according to Carmen L. Durso, a lawyer in Boston.
A copy of the directive was sent yesterday to U.S. Attorney Michael J. Sullivan, in his office, Ms. Durso, who claimed to believe that the church was obstructing the work of justice.
Durso said that might explain why Cardinal Bernard F. Law and the bishops of the archdiocese of Borton and elsewhere, had covered up child sex abuse by priestsis.
Durso yesterday asked Sullivan for fields lower federal laws to prosecute the part of the hierarchy that had covered up these sexual abuse cases. Daniel J.
Shea, a Houston attorney, Durso gave him a copy of the Vatican called "
How to proceed in cases
Solicitation" (Latin for "
Crime dispense with [ati] on [i] s
). Both lawyers representing alleged victims of abuse by priests in Central Massachusetts. Paul Baier, presidingto "I said. Durso shares began when Attorney General Thomas F. Reilly presented a report of the grand jury indictment last week, which was a critique of the hierarchy of the Archdiocese of Boston for failing to protect children from pedophile priests. Said he had no report fields from which legal charges against the Church and found that at least 800 children had been sexually abused by 250 priests in the archdiocese since 1940. "This document could provide the link between the mobile of all those who hiddocument states that the bishop, who is called the "ordinary" has control over these charges and in cases where the defendants are members of religious orders, the superior may remove the accused from the parish and "also be able to transfer to another (parish), unless the local ordinary has been banned because it has already accepted the complaint and start with the canonical view of the priest in question. " The document said that great care needed in these cases, investigate it "would be restrained if they keep quiet forever" and would be asked to "keep this secret hidden, andwhich is usually seen as a secret of the Holy Office in all matters and persons, on pain of excommunication ... " The duty to keep this secret is also of complainants who confess their" ; crime. "
This guideline also states that "a person who is" requested "in the confessional must report the accident to the bishop or the Holy Office in less than a month. The confessor should keep the confession as such, in secret, and act to solve the problem without disclosing it confessed to anyone.
A person alleging a priest of this crime to justice, rather than the authority which is
0 comments:
Post a Comment